Don’t Take Voting for Granted
"Voting isn't the most we can do.
But it is the least" [Gloria Steinem]
If the ballot doesn't work, we'll try
something else, but let us try the ballot.” [Malcolm X]
So what does it mean to vote,
exactly? It's something that many people can't access today, or have
fought for centuries, to have a democratic process happen where they
are truly represented. Few people in the history of this world have
ever had the choice in electing their own government.
One snapshot of the problem comes from
the Democracy Index, a project of the Economist Intelligence Unit,
which ranks how 167 countries are run.
Only 22, mostly in Western Europe,
rate as full democracies, in which civil liberties are respected and
protected by adequate checks and balances on government power.
The US is among 54 flawed democracies
on the Index, or nations that provide free elections, and honor basic
civil liberties, but suffer from major institutional problems, like
governance problems. The last time I checked, we rank just ahead of
Malta and Estonia in those areas.
Thirty-seven more nations on the Index
are classified as hybrids, or flawed democracies hobbled by issues
like rigged elections. The remaining 54 are authoritarian, mostly in
Africa, or the Middle East, in which basic rights are severely
oppressed, under threat, or essentially nonexistent.
Americans take the ability and right to
vote for granted, when this has been chipped away. Even if you feel
there is no one that's worth supporting, don't ever give up. Don't
fall for the idea, “Oh, your vote doesn't matter,” or, “All
those politicians are sold out, and rotten, anyway.”
Otherwise, you're just giving in to
inertia. Voting is an important part of any activist's toolbox, even
if it means sticking only with local races, or there's only candidate
you're able to support. So you go and protest, but never show up to
vote? Then you're missing an important part.
Poor people and people of color, and
women all had to fight for the right to vote. People forget that our
time in America of having an equal vote among all races, and sexes is
a very recent development. Women didn’t gain the right to vote
until 1920, Native Americans until 1924 – and some had to wait
until 1948 – while 18- to 20-year-olds could not vote until 1971.
Before that date, most states set the
bar for voting at 21, even though you were old enough to marry, get
sent off to war, and pay taxes. Vietnam raised the issue with the
saying, ''Old enough to fight, old enough to die – old enough to
vote.”
By the 1980s and 1990s, however,
getting young people to vote, or engaged politically, was nearly
impossible – leading to campaigns like MTV's “Rock The Vote”
effort, because so many people of our own generation checked out. I
was politically active, however. I protested the Iraq War in the
2000s, and for much of that time, never missed a vote.
Too many of Generation X took the
slacker media image to heart, though, and lost motivation for civil
involvement. These days, from what I can tell, young people are
getting more politically involved – and that’s good, because
political vigilance is needed to keep our freedom and right now, we
are in danger of it slipping away. Part of this vigilance requires
exercising our voting rights as an informed citizen.
That brings me to our current problem
of Voter Suppression, where a ruling political party or clique works
to curtail the ability of certain groups or individuals from voting,
or limit their representation in government.
For authoritarian or hybrid regimes,
that often means sending police or paramilitary groups to polling
places, either to scare off a particular candidate's supporters, or
force them to vote for its preferred candidate. Sound familiar
lately?
Claiming additional years in office is
another common tactic. Examples include Russia's leader, Vladimir
Putin, who's just signed himself on as “president for life”
through 2036, or the Ivory Coast, whose former president plans to
seek a third term – defying his opponents, who argue its
constitution forbids it. However, the government has already
announced that national elections will go ahead, with or without its
critics.
Other voter suppression tactics include
changing how checks and balances work. In Poland, judges have been
removed for not being loyal enough to the ironically-named Law &
Justice Party, which then passed laws to give itself, the dominant
political force, more power over the judiciary.
These things happen here, too. We all
remember what happened in 2018, when Georgia's Secretary Of State
Brian Kemp, whose office oversees elections, defeated Stacey Abrams –
on paper, anyway – amid bitter accusations of voter suppression.
For those who keep score, Kemp's office
canceled 1.4 million voter registrations between 2012 and 2018,
including half a million in one night in 2017 – what the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution called “maybe the largest mass
disenfranchisement in US history.”
Here's the rub, though.
Unfair as they definitely are, such tactics are not illegal, in light
of two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions – including Citizens
United, which allowed corporations to count as “people” under
the law. Many believe this 2010 ruling sold democracy to the highest
bidder, and made Super-PACS a reality.
The
other case is Shelby County v. Holder, a 5-4 ruling in
2013, where the justices threw out the idea of preclearance – or
getting federal approval, in advance, for changes in voting laws and
practices.
This is why we're seeing the last minute closing
or shrinking of polling places in states like Ohio and Texas, for
instance, or the tightening of voter ID laws – where someone
without a driver's license ends up shut out of voting altogether, or
unable to vote absentee, if they can't produce an excuse like a
doctor's note. Or their name might end up getting struck off the
list, as Kemp did in Georgia.
The Holder ruling prompted late
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to fume, in one of her most blistering
dissents: “Throwing out preclearance when it has worked, and is
continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes, is like throwing
away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”
Last but not least, let's not forget
about gerrymandering, or redrawing district boundaries to lock down
opposition-proof majorities for favored politicians – a tactic that
often shuts minorities and other marginalized groups out of the
equation.
Not surprisingly, the current Supreme
Court has proven indifferent to addressing the problem, as it showed
in a 5-4 ruling last summer that threw out challenges to redrawn
districts in Maryland and North Carolina.
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice
John Roberts claimed “partisan gerrymandering claims present
political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.” Again,
his reasoning prompted a scathing dissent from Ginsburg, and her more
liberal colleagues: “If left unchecked, gerrymanders like the ones
here may irreparably damage our system of government.”
The Michigan Supreme Court apparently
followed the same rulebook in October 2019, when it ruled, 5-4, that
34 districts didn't need to be redrawn until 2022, even though they
purposely favored Republicans.
The decision also means that a
13-member independent commission can't do its job until 2022 – even
though Michigan voters overwhelmingly created it four years earlier,
in 2018, by a statewide referendum. The walls being thrown up against
people of color, the poor, voters with disabilities, and young people
are getting higher and wider all the time, it seems.
We get in our cars and go to a polling
station, or fill out our ballots early now, not realizing how many
people in America today are stopped from voting. Not everyone has a
car to get to a polling place. People with disabilities may need help
with reading a ballot, or even marking one. Accessible voting
machines are available in our state, but are needed in lots of other
places.
Whatever happened to government or
civics classes? We need them more than ever nowadays, instead of
teaching to standardized tests. Knowing how the system's supposed to
work is the first step in trying to change it.
We also need to better educate young
people on how marginalized groups like women and African-Americans,
stood up against poll taxes, literacy tests and other tactics rolled
out to prevent them from voting.
That kind of context is crucial,
especially when you consider the approach of movies like Mississippi
Burning, that present civil rights as a history lesson that
wrapped up in the 1960s, or early 1970s, depending who's spinning the
narrative. I doubt Stacey Abrams would see it that way, though.
Never take voting for granted. One
important way to stand against Voter Suppression is exercise your
right to vote, and agitate for everyone else's right to vote too.
Don’t give in to apathy or thinking your vote won’t matter. This
has chipped away at voting in America for too long, and we are seeing
the results.
I think we need to bring back to the
concept of civic duty, of being a good citizen, of being informed,
and participating in your own government. After all, it’s supposed
to be FOR THE PEOPLE. It's up to us to keep it that way.